Novelist. Author of APSARAS and tales from the beautiful Saigh Valley. First person to quantify spiritual values.

Total Pageviews

Wednesday, 13 December 2017

A Tale of Two Tribes

The new Labour Muslim Network, headed by an activist who allegedly said that 'Israel had no right to exist', seeks to reinforce the push by the socialists to secure the UK Muslim vote. They know that if they can gather the support of the Imams they will be able, by virtue of the tribal structure of Muslim communities, to influence the voting intentions of their community.
Another tribe that won't accept opinion other than  that espoused by the leader, no matter how wrong, are the followers of Manchester United. Their leader, the Manager, Mourinho, described the celebrating, victorious Manchester City players as 'educationally diverse', a euphemism no doubt for his pejorative response to defeat. (Result: United 1- 2 City). In both instances, the tribe will not accept that they are wrong in their belief that they are the chosen ones. In Mourinho's view, City cheated and had luck and the officials on their side. In the past, when Muslims won their battles, God was with them but when they lost, he was merely 'testing' them. No setback would deflect them from their belief.
Now the Labour Party under their 'messiah' Corbyn conveniently ignores that throughout the globe most conflicts involve Muslims. From Burma and Thailand in Asia, to Europe and today in the US it is the followers of Islam who are responsible, whereas as far as I know, Israel only protects its borders. But no, Corbyn and other supporters of terrorists such as the IRA and Hamas cannot see the carnage that Islam has inflicted on the Middle East, nor can Mourinho accept that he and his team were well beaten at the weekend. Different scales, I know, but the same problem due to entrenched views, a consequence of the natural 'Rule of Two. see:

Tuesday, 5 December 2017

Interference in UK politics

Am I missing something here? One week, the House of Commons and the liberal elite are condemning Donald Trump for interfering in UK politics and the following week not a peep when the Irish Republic does the same with regards to the Country's Brexit terms.

Friday, 1 December 2017

Perfidy in the Commons

Yesterday saw a disgraceful betrayal of the British majority when Members of the House of Commons spoke out in unison against the sensible advice of the President of the United States. POTUS is said to have retweeted videos showing Moslem violence, claimed to be fake, whilst advising the UK to be wary of Islamic terrorism. Some on the Labour side wanted a State visit cancelled and a few wanted him arrested on landing on UK soil. When members on all sides collude together to see who can be the most obnoxious one has to sense something is up. On the Labour side it's easy to see that at a need for the Moslem vote to preserve their majority demands a pro Islam stance bordering on the anti-semitic. It is harder to guess why Tory members should follow suit given that the US is the UK's most powerful ally, but the Prime Minister is said to have voiced her unease at POTUS's intrusion into UK's domestic politics. Why? when he talks common sense. I have said before that the threat to global peace does not come from Scandinavians, South Sea Islanders or people from Malta, it comes from the followers of Islam as manifest in every corner of the globe apart from Antarctica and I bet somebody has plans to erect a mosque there soon. The followers of Islam hold grudges from Biblical times and are intent on making earth a grand Sultanate, exactly as seen in Turkey where a twentieth century country is gradually being turned into a parody of the Ottoman Empire by the megalomaniac leader, Erdogan.
As the Commons vented their outrage an Islamic terror group broadcast their desire to kill Western children over Christmas as a reprisal for all the kids killed by air raids in Syria and Iraq. You won't find condemnation of this amongst the Labour ranks whose leader prefers to dally with Hamas and Hezbollah and talk tactics with the IRA. What, I ask myself, has the most glorious nation on earth done to deserve this bunch of stupid idiots in the mother of all parliaments? These members are, with a few exceptions, looking after their own interests, not those of the nation and the majority of British people whose family's built the Country and Empire for the Glory of the world. Why didn't somebody ask the Minister, Amber Rudd, how many people have been killed in the UK by extreme right wing groups during the last two years and how many have been slaughtered by followers of Islam. You can guess the answer and guess, also, who the 'honourable' members wish to proscribe. Confusion to the lot of them.

Saturday, 25 November 2017

Good & Evil

I have been given a book or rather a series of books to review. It is a serious work aimed at reconciling traditional Jewish theology with the problem of evil or more precisely the prickly problem of why does it exist in a universe created by a loving, compassionate God.
For theologians it is a tricky question and many theodicies have been suggested such as; finite man cannot possibly understand an infinite (inscrutible) God or for man to attain the highest virtues, to become more perfect, it is necessary for mankind to suffer. The latter does not explain why it is necessary that some should suffer more than others or why children should be harmed but all religions require a leap of faith with some of their beliefs.
Far easier to explain that evil manifest in mankind (moral evil as opposed to natural evil) is simply a product of natural selection and survival of the fittest.
Take the cuckoo as an example. To raise its young he must kill the issue of another species of bird and lay its egg in their place. By this means it not only murders its kids but defrauds the host bird of time and assets. From the host birds point of view it has been sinned against (without remedy). Nature has introduced sin to enable one species to take advantage of another by means of murder and fraud. What makes it different with humans is that we have developed a code of conduct in an effort to curtail natural instincts to take advantage of others to further their own interests. This is entirely arbitrary as the cuckoo would insist he hasn't sinned but humans in an attempt at civilised society have adopted a set of rules not dissimilar to those mentioned in the ten commandments.
But where does God fit in, if at all?
It is difficult to see how if we accept that good and evil are just two ends of a one dimensional continuum. see the diagram.

Everybody sits somewhere on the line; there is no mystery, no room for spirituality in the orthodoxy. If, however we think of good and evil as part of a three dimensional set up as shown, it can be shown that at any level of goodness we can identify extremes. Take the trinitarian equation which shows the relationship between our perception of goodness and its components.
Perceived goodness, G = ±√[ (+g)² + (-g)² + (ig)²]
where '+g' is the real goodness (good), '-g' is the unreal goodness, (evil) and 'ig' is the imaginary goodness ('i' is the square root of minus one).
Solving we have perceived goodness, G =  ± g. As with the one dimensional view we have the answer good and evil. Only now we have what we've referred to as 'imaginary' goodness. It is absolutely necessary but does not itself appear in the answer. Is this the goodness of God (or Satan) or is it merely the intrinsic goodness of mankind?

The trinitarian equation is a fundamental component of The Davies Hypothesis

Cognitive Bias

A recent Horizon program aired on the BBC dealt with the subject of Cognitive Bias or the conflict in our minds of intuition over logic. Kahneman & Tversky introduced the subject in the nineteen-seventies, identifying two types of rationale. System 1 reflects our swift, snap judgements that require little effort providing simple solutions to our daily needs. It gives almost instantaneous responses. System 2 on the other hand requires more judgemental time where we weigh more complex problems in our mind.
Unfotunately our snap decisions are prone to error because our minds are full of inherent biases, 150 of which have been identified.
At the risk of committing 'confirmation' bias, (  see wikipedia ) I wonder whether we can identify Systems 1 & 2 with the The Davies Hypothesis that posits that consciousness is defined by the three modes of time operating in the brain. 'Real' and 'unreal' time in the brain operate at a fixed rate set by the expansion of the universe but 'imaginary' time can vary giving rise to different perceptions. Could it be that System 1 decision making is related to 'imaginary' time working in the brain in the same way that it deals with shock and intuitive reaction, often needed in sports. System 2 thinking follows the process of information gathering (understanding), reference to memory (knowledge) and rational thought leading to wisdom.

Thursday, 9 November 2017

Priti Patel.

Priti Patel has resigned her post following revelations that she has misled the Prime Minister, May, over her meetings with Israeli Army and Government representatives. As the minister for Overseas Development, it is widely thought that she broke a ministerial code by usurping the Foreign Office's brief.
The meetings took place while she was on a personal holiday and were said to centre on giving aid to the Israeli military who are doing humanitarian work in the Golan Heights, adjoining the Syrian border. Apparently thousands of refugees, escaping the civil war, are crossing into the disputed territory, occupied by Israeli forces.
This smacks of a 'deniable' operation. Sadly for her, Patel's exploits were uncovered and has to face the consequences alone, the British Government washing their hands of an undercover project. What could it be? something to do with anti-semitism in the Labour Party.......

Priti Patel is another second generation immigrant to become a Member of Parliament. I don't know how many there are but they should be disbarred from standing on the grounds that they and their families have not lived in the UK long enough. Second generation immigrants ought not to represent peoples who have lived in the Country for many generations; the indigenous population. There are several including the former Labour leader, Miliband and Tory, Baroness Waasi.

Tuesday, 7 November 2017

Man from Out of this World

From our local correspondent. Jerusalem. Year 33 common era.
A man called Jesus, originally from Nazareth and who recently, at passover, was crucified and miraculously came back to life, has disappeared. His friends insist he 'ascended into heaven'.

A Russian man insists he is descended from a man who originally came from Mars see:
I had a life on Mars: Russian, 20, claims he lived on the Red Planet before being reborn on Earth
Boriska Kipriyanovich, 20, has confounded experts with his knowledge of space
His parents claim that the wonderkid was able to speak months after he was born
He amazed his doctors by being able to read, write and draw by the age of two
Boriska, from Volgograd, says he lived on a 'war-ravaged' Mars in a previous life
By Alexander Robertson For Mailonline
PUBLISHED: 17:13 GMT, 6 November 2017 | UPDATED: 17:51 GMT, 6 November 2017

Read more: 

The stories have a similarity but could they have a common explanation?
TO the DAILY MAIL. An open letter.
I sent a copy of my book: Spiritual Man: An Introduction to Negative Dimensions (here) to your science correspondent, Fiona McCrea in May, 2015 to review but had no acknowledgement let alone a reply. The book explains how this might occur citing as an example the story of Jesus, a man who never died and was taken away by God. I maintain that Jesus inherited the character of his ancestor of 70 generations before, Enoch, who famously 'walked' with god and never died, being taken up to heaven. Has the Russian man inherited a character from antiquity, perhaps one of the Nephalim who walked this planet in pre-history?

Thursday, 2 November 2017

The DAVIES HYPOTHESIS. A declaration.

The DAVIES HYPOTHESIS. A declaration.

The universe is ordered as it is because nature must take account of all the correct answers to the question: What are the fourth roots of one, unity.

Where 'i' represents the square root of minus one.

Each of the dimensions we recognise, three of space and one of time, has to be defined in terms of each of the above answers. Therefore, ultimately, there must be sixteen (4x4) dimensions to explain everything.
Although we only perceive the answer highlighted, the world we perceive, its complications and paradoxes are the result of nature doing what the hypothesis suggests. Not the eighth or sixteenth roots but the unique solution offered by the fourth roots. Evidence of the use of the square roots of one can be seen around us; it gives rise to choice, contrasts such as good and evil and others briefly outlined in the biblical book of Ecclesiastes 3. But life is more complex than that, hence the fourth roots. By adopting this concept I am able to answer the questions of how the universe came into being and explain the nature of time. I refer interested readers to my book or the series of talks on you tube called The Davies Hypothesis

Thursday, 26 October 2017

Thoughts on Jared O'Mara

One might be excused for thinking of O'Mara as a hero for dethroning that arch remainer, Clegg from his seat in Sheffield Hallam but you would be wrong. Judging from numerous reports, the man seems incapable of proper behaviour especially towards women.
Much of what is currently being said relates to what he is alleged to have said when he was much younger with apologists in the Labour Party suggesting that O'Mara was 'on a journey' and that he was a changed man such as Labour Shadow Women and Equalities minister Dawn Butler who says, “He probably still has further to go on his journey.”
The point is that what the Labour Party are saying is that when we are younger, we don't know what we are talking about but let's lower the voting age to sixteen. Stupidity compounded by yet more stultifying stupidity. Voters of Sheffield Hallam kick the lot of them out.

Friday, 20 October 2017

Have you noticed?

Have you noticed that Corbyn, leader of the UK's official opposition, not content with splashing out taxpayer's money at home has now gone to Europe to repeat the process. At home, no matter your status, he was promising more money, more job security whether you were young, old, ethnic or minority, you were in line for a cornucopia of munificence. Even the very wealthy would get away with only modest tax increases if they stayed long enough to qualify.
Now, he's gone to Europe telling foreign negotiators that under his leadership the UK's taxpayers would meet their extortionate Brexit demands whatever they were. The Labour Party wouldn't be paying, nor the Unions but adopting the tactics of capitulation and white flag diplomacy this man seems to be hell bent on reducing the UK to a laughing stock or worse.